Talk:Patch 44

Take that. Hope it helps get the criticism rounded up. Zackrob dice 22:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Was correcting the same thing margeman, in the same moment :P Zackrob dice 22:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Some typos, added the reaction subtitle and text. Zackrob dice 14:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I find Thehistorian's edit to be unacceptable. He removed all content regarding the controversy surrounding this issue. The entire "impact" section was removed, which is completely unacceptable because it contained objective information (posting stats) as well as links to posts demonstrating the impact of this patch. He then removed the entire "criticism" section, which again, contained facts pertaining to the criticism of this patch. As well, the entire "reaction" section was erased as well. I believe this edit should be undone immediately, and the article should be restored to the 14:52, 4 June 2008 version. Margeman2k3 05:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Edited, re-formated it. Updated and reentered the old content into the newer version of the Historian. Hope this version will fit most of us. Please enter your ideas here if you have any other edits to make: I really think it's important to keep this article as it is, because it has started the biggest change to the community. Also it's not offensive speech, so no reason to completely delete/alter my work. I will take this version as root to any more malevolent censorship to this neutral post. Zackrob dice 09:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This version is fine now, i extended the page by Acclaim Mods reaction on release date and the recent changes. When the Ad-Bar vanishes - and I hope it will soon - we should restructure it in chronological order and probably spend an own page "Ad-Bar". Someone should explain Acclaim that Wikis are resistant against censorship. Telperiar 20:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Gave it a new shape again, please correct me if anything occurred, English is my 3rd language after all =) Zackrob dice 19:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)